Establish daily yield analysis
Tracked CPM and win-rate performance by exchange to support frequent pricing decisions.
Case study 15 · Yield Management
Dynamic pricing, inventory segmentation, and first-party data improved auction pressure.
A real-estate publisher redesigned its AdX and demand strategy so premium inventory was priced and exposed more competitively rather than being trapped in a static, low-yield hierarchy.

Premium property-research audiences were not translating into premium yield. A static hierarchy favored lower-paying demand, inventory was not segmented by value, and AdX faced too little competitive pressure. The publisher needed better pricing control without sacrificing fill.
The work was organized around a small number of operating choices that could be governed, measured, and repeated—not a collection of disconnected initiatives.
Tracked CPM and win-rate performance by exchange to support frequent pricing decisions.
Adjusted value CPMs and floor logic so demand partners had to compete more aggressively for premium supply.
Applied differentiated pricing to premium placements, audience groups, and remnant inventory.
Used audience segments and retargeting potential to strengthen the commercial value of requests.
eCPM increased by 30% through stronger competition and more disciplined pricing.
Revenue increased 73% as pricing and demand allocation improved.
Daily analysis and exchange reviews replaced static setup with ongoing optimization.